An independent guide to Maine’s places, past, and presentinfo@maineanencyclopedia.com-html.com
Mainean
Encyclopedia
Commercial fishing boats moored in a working harbor
Economy · Working waterfront

Commercial Fisheries

A historical overview of seafood landings, changing species, aquaculture, fishing employment, and the coastal access that connects Maine harvesters with the market.

A changing harvest

In 1950, Maine recorded seafood landings of 356,266,000 pounds without aquaculture and ranked among the leading seafood-producing states. By 2009, the last national comparison cited in the source material, Maine ranked eleventh by pounds landed and third by value.

Preliminary figures for 2010 reported 251,299,375 pounds, including aquaculture, with an ex-vessel value of $450,664,717—an average of $1.79 per pound. These historical seafood landing figures show the sector’s substantial economic role, even though total pounds had declined by about one-third from the 1950 record.

Reading historical data carefully

Direct comparisons are complicated because aquaculture was included in the 2010 figures and the mix of species changed significantly. Monetary values are also nominal historical figures and should not be treated as current prices.

In 2010, aquaculture-produced Atlantic salmon accounted for 10 percent of pounds and 18 percent of value. American lobster represented 37 percent of pounds and 70 percent of the value of all species in that dataset.

Cold Atlantic waves breaking along Maine's rocky coast
The Gulf of Maine supports fisheries shaped by season, habitat, market demand, and changing ocean conditions.

Economic reach

The broader economic multiplier of commercial seafood is difficult to calculate. Industry estimates cited in the historical source placed the sector’s total value above $1.2 billion when related activity was considered. Recreational fisheries, party and charter boats, and fishing guides contributed additional activity, but the article’s source material cautioned that those multiplier effects were not well understood.

In 2002, Maine fishermen landed more fish and shellfish than any other Northeast state fishery for the eighth consecutive year. Portland ranked second in the Northeast and fifteenth nationally by the value of product landed.

Historical 2002 profile

  • About 227 million pounds of fish and shellfish were harvested.
  • Approximately 60 species were represented in the harvest.
  • Lobster contributed $207 million of a $300 million total landed value.
  • Atlantic salmon landings were valued at $17 million and clams at $15 million.
  • Some 250 boats sold products through the Portland Fish Exchange.
  • Estimated employment included 6,000 full-time and 4,300 part-time harvesters.
  • The state recorded 18,000 fishing-harvesting licenses in 2000.

These figures are retained as historical snapshots, not descriptions of present-day landings, employment, licensing, or value.

Waterfront and tidal access

Research cited in the source estimated that commercial fishing generated 26,000 jobs and $740 million in economic activity at the time of publication. It also emphasized the dependence of fishing on a narrow band of coastal waterfront and dozens of ports that moved seafood from boats to markets.

Much of that access was provided through privately operated working residential and commercial wharves, with the remainder through public piers. Access to tidal flats is similarly important for harvesting clams and marine worms. Traditional access can be disrupted when coastal property use changes or established entry points close.

Historic snapshot

The scale of the harvest

Selected figures from the article’s underlying records illustrate scale and change. They are dated reference points rather than current statistics.

356.3M lb

Record seafood landings reported for 1950, excluding aquaculture.

251.3M lb

Preliminary 2010 landings, including aquaculture.

60

Approximate species represented in the 2002 harvest profile.

18,000

Fishing-harvesting licenses reported for 2000.

Coastal infrastructure

From vessel to wharf

Commercial fisheries rely on more than fish stocks: vessels need durable waterfront infrastructure, safe transfer points, storage, parking, and routes to market.

Access pressures

How working access can be lost

The original account identified recurring land-use and environmental pressures that can weaken commercial fishing infrastructure.

1

Intertidal entry

No-trespassing restrictions and contested paths can remove traditional routes to flats used for harvesting clams and marine worms.

2

Uncertain tenure

Lease arrangements can make continued access fragile when a working property changes ownership or use.

3

Competing uses

Reliance on one public facility can create pressure among fishing, recreational, transportation, and other harbor users.

4

Land and climate

Limited parking, conversion of working wharves, and climate change affecting Casco Bay can all alter operating conditions.

Research trail

Selected sources

These works were cited in the source article and provide historical, institutional, and policy context for Maine’s commercial fisheries.

Baron-Taltre, Benjamin. The Rise and Fall of the Maine Sea Urchin Industry: A Failure of Management and Institutions? M.S. thesis in Marine Policy, University of Maine, 2005.

Co-management: The New England Town Meeting Goes to Sea. Moving-image recording presented by Mainewatch Institute and Island Institute, 1997.

Dow, Robert L. Effects of Climatic Cycles on the Relative Abundance and Availability of Commercial Marine and Estuarine Species. Maine Department of Marine Resources, 1977.

Hamlin, Cyrus, and John R. Ordway. The Commercial Fisheries of Maine. University of Maine, circa 1974.

Maine Department of Marine Resources, Program Review Committee. Program Review of the Maine Department of Marine Resources. 2011.

Maine Department of Sea and Shore Fisheries. Commercial Fisheries of Maine. 1947 and 1957 editions.

Maine Department of Transportation. Evaluation of Maine’s Fish Pier Program. 1987.

Sheehan, M. Elizabeth. Maine Fisheries: A Re-emerging Market. 2000.

Sheehan, Elizabeth. Tracking Commercial Fishing Access: A Survey of Harbormasters in 25 Maine Coastal Communities. 2004.

Continue exploring

Connected reference topics

Follow the ecological and economic connections among species, shore access, climate, and historical landing data.

FAQ

Understanding this entry

Important context for interpreting the article’s historical figures and terminology.

Are these current commercial fishing statistics?

No. The figures are historical snapshots drawn from records covering years such as 1950, 2000, 2002, 2009, and 2010. They should not be used as current landing, employment, licensing, or price data.

Why are 1950 and 2010 difficult to compare?

The 1950 total excluded aquaculture, while the preliminary 2010 total included it. Species composition also changed, so total pounds alone do not describe the same type of harvest.

What does “ex-vessel value” mean?

It is the value paid to harvesters for seafood when it is first landed, before later processing, distribution, retail, and related economic activity.

Why does the species mix matter?

Species differ greatly in landed price and volume. A lower total weight can therefore have a comparatively high value if more of the harvest consists of higher-value species.

Why is working waterfront access important?

Harvesters need places to berth vessels, load gear, land catch, reach storage and transport, and maintain access to tidal harvesting areas. Loss of these connections can restrict fishing even when marine resources remain available.

How does climate connect with commercial fisheries?

Changing water conditions can influence species distribution, abundance, timing, and habitat. The linked Casco Bay entry provides additional local context.

↑ Top